|
September 10, 2008
–
I know we should expect it by now, but
come on.
I mean, way back in July 2003 M/I ran
the article titled, "Republicans
Begin to Cry Like Babies, Swear Like Bullies." Caught
about lying about Iraq, the Bush administration was, of course,
attacking the media for being in an irresponsible "frenzy."
Yes, just like the McCain camp is now attacking the media for being
in an unfair frenzy about Palin's inexperience and background.
You should take a second and read that
article - it will give you some real perspective on the game they
are playing now with Palin's introduction.
In fact, all the GOP'ers are playing
this whiny little bitch game, obviously trying to assert the
nonsensical idea that they can have a convention in which every
speaker acts like an name-calling, truth-twisting asshole, but that
Obama and his camp, if they respond, are out of line. Yes,
just like they did with critics of their Iraq fraud.
Leading the charge is whiny
tattle-tale-in-chief Matt "I'm a pansy" Drudge. For those of
you not so familiar with this man, here's a little piece from M/I's
February 2004 article
Who Exactly Is Matt Drudge And What Is It He Does?:
“Drudge is not
a reporter, a journalist or a newsgatherer. He is, as he himself
admits, simply a purveyor of gossip. See Complaint, Exs. 6, 8. His
argument that he should benefit from the "news gathering
exception" to subsection (a)(4) of the long-arm statute merits no
serious consideration.”
"This is not
speculation or commentary from any political type. This is the
legal opinion of a judge who presided over a defamation suit in
which Drudge was involved a few years ago. (SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL and
JACQUELINE JORDAN BLUMENTHAL, Plaintiffs, v. MATT DRUDGE and
AMERICA ONLINE, INC., Defendants., Civil Action No. 97-1968 (PFL),
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 992 F.
Supp. 44; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5606; 26 Media L. Rep. 1717; 12
Comm. Reg. (P & F) 367, April 22, 1998, Decided, April 22, 1998,
Filed)..."
What Matt might
not so readily admit about himself is that all day, every day he
wines and cries to mommy like a pathetic little wuss. I mean,
his headline tonight was Obama's comment about the new post-Palin
McCain message being "lipstick on a pig."
Aw, poor Matt
Drudgey Drudge. Did bad bad Obama call your pig the pig she...
I mean he is?
A couple days
ago Drudge was whining that Oprah won't have Palin on her show.
It's bias, his headline blared - of course in his usual
passive-aggressive way of pretending he's not really saying the
whiny bitch things he's clearly saying. No, he's just
coincidentally putting up headlines that clearly make a, "Look
mommy, see how bad they're being," point without owning up to what
he's doing. That's worse than being a whiny bitch - that's
being a whiny bitch who's too much of a whiny bitch to admit your
whining and bitching.
But its not
just Drudge. The McCain camp, every time anyone says anything
about Palin, they cry, "It's a new low," "It's unfair," "It's out of
bounds."
see:
Biden's comments on special needs kids
called 'new low'
or:
McCain camp angry
over Obama's 'lipstick' comment
Excuse me but,
boo hoo hoo. Is this the same man who endured five years in a
prison camp? 'Pig in lipstick' is now too much for you to
take, John?
And wait a
second, isn't this the same John McCain who just held a convention
that took the high-road tone that Obama's convention had set and let
speaker after speaker piss all over it with name calling, demeaning
personal insults, and flat out lies? Isn't this the John
McCain who had a speech written for his neophyte VP-wannabe that
turned her into a respectless, defiling "Pit Bull"?
I tell you,
they seem more like a bunch of Chihuahuas than Pit Bulls. Yap
yap yap, and then the second someone responds by getting angry they
go running off and crying and more yap yap yap.
If they wanted
to play this whiny "we're the victims" game, they shouldn't have
made Palin issue that "I'm a big-mouthed bitch" speech last week.
They could have had her show some basic realm of respect. She
could have presented herself as if dignified. And the rest of
the convention speakers didn't have to be boasting and snidely
crowing like geezers jacked up on too much Viagra.
They are the
scrawny little losers who shoot the spitball at you from behind and
then go running to the teacher when you turn around to kick their
ass.
'It's sexist to
question her experience.' WTF? How many months of
questioning Obama's? 9? 10?
'It's unfair to
use "lipstick on a pig!" Excuse me? You, whiner McCain,
used the exact phrase in an attack on Hillary Clinton.
"It's unfair
that Oprah won't have her on the show." Um, 1) have you
seen Oprah rush to have Biden on? and 2) Maybe your
Chihuahua bitch should attempt even one real interview first before
having the, "What do you make for breakfast," Oprah tea time.
What are you a sexist? It's a show named for someone with tits
so she owes it to Palin's tits to share tit time with her and her
titty-having viewers?
Sheesh.
Stop whining already. We know, John, you chose Sarah Palin so
you could destroy the useful conversation we were having about
policies. We know you had already stooped to running ads using
Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. Now, you have another young
hotty - young to your old self at least - to try and distract
America so you can sneak into the White House despite the fact
Americans don't like what you would do there.
Well, while
you're whining, let's give you something to whine about: your
"hot" pit bull bitch not only is more of a Chihuahua than a Pitter,
but she's actually not that hot. Her weaselly little smile and
those bugged out, "Hand me a snake and stand back while I speak
tongues" eyes are more scary than attractive. She's no Paris
Hilton. No, she's more like something from the movie "Carrie."
Ok, go ahead
and whine about me being out of line. But last time I checked,
whining and bitching was never the best way to get people to want
you to stay at their house for four years.
| 
