JAN 16 - 31, 2004




The Democratic Debate Actually Serves A Purpose And Lets People See The True Choice Set Before Them

by Betsy R. Vasquez


JANUARY 29, 2004 – This time it was a different story.

Tom Brokaw was laying out the premise of a question to General Wesley Clark.

BROKAW: General Clark, you've been quite outspoken in blaming the Bush administration for the terrorist attacks of 9/11. You better...

Notice the trail of dots.  That is because this time Clark did not let the nonsense continue, but instead cut in and immediately set things straight.

CLARK: No, no, no, Tom, no, I didn't blame the Bush administration for the attacks. We know who did the attacks. It was Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida. But what I have said is that the president did not do all he could have done to have prevented that attack.

The contrast between the two debates were like night and day. No smears from the moderator, everyone was treated equally. And so, we had a useful event that truly gave each candidate a full chance to affect their place in the presidential race.

The biggest story of the night was answers from Senator Edwards that were incomprehensible.

Asked by moderator Tom Brokaw of NBC News if he believes we have gotten enough help from our Arab allies in the War on Terror, Edwards chose to go back to a previous point and made the following unthinkable statement:

"Can I just go back a moment ago -- to a question you asked just a moment ago? You asked, I believe, Senator Kerry earlier whether there's an exaggeration of the threat of the war on terrorism.

"It's just hard for me to see how you can say there's an exaggeration when thousands of people lost their lives on September the 11th."

Let's repeat that:

"It's just hard for me to see how you can say there's an exaggeration when thousands of people lost their lives on September the 11th."

That was completely absurd and a huge moment in this debate.  Edwards, whose weakest point already is his lack of gravitas and foreign policy credentials, now said flat out that he is incapable of understanding that, despite the fact that 9/11 occurred, the President could still have lied and exaggerated.

What does one have to do with the other?  The answer is nothing.

To stand there and assert that you can't say, "there's an exaggeration when thousands of people lost their lives," is to buy into the most basic lies of the Bush administration.  It is the sort of thing the amoral puppets at FOX News assert.

9/11 occurring did not make Saddam have WMDs, and if the President exaggerated, as the Carnegie Report detailed him and his administration doing, then he exaggerated, regardless of what else happened.  There is no connection, and no useful presidential candidate would ever assert that allowing the slaughter of American people somehow means that it is impossible for lying to exist.  What is the connection?

Absolutely this was an horrific answer.

But wait, Edwards was not done.

Asked about job losses, John Edwards tried to get folksy.  It was his moment to shine.  His father was a textile mill worker just 40 miles away from where the debate was occurring, and so he was going to show he understood things better than anyone else.

And then, he issued the following comment:

"...all this talk among politicians in Washington about, "We're going to get you job retraining program, we're going to make sure that we give you the transportation to get to a new job," say that to a 50- or 55-year-old man who's been supporting his family his entire life working in a mill."

Now, I know some factory workers.  I've known a man who spent his entire adult life doing nothing but pulling a single lever all day every day.  For years he would go to work at the factory where he worked and pull that lever.  With time, as he approached the age of 55, he started to have health issues related to doing nothing but pulling that same lever all day.

The health issues became so big he started to miss work, and, in the end, couldn't go back to pulling that lever all day.  In his late 50's, he wasn't trained for anything else, and so was forced to simply call himself retired, even though he wasn't in the financial shape nor at the place in his life where he was ready to retire.  If he had been offered job retraining, he would have been grateful.

But Edwards asserted that 55 year-old mill workers were either too stupid, lazy, or inadaptable to want or be able to take advantage of job retraining.  Many would welcome the opportunity to have a different career.  Edwards' comment was an arrogant, pedantic insult.

And yet, Edwards was not done yet.

Brokaw asked Edwards:

"...you're opposed to gay marriages and you say that, in your home state of North Carolina, you do not believe that they should have to recognize a gay marriage that takes place, for example, in Canada, or one that may, in the future, take place in Massachusetts. How is that moving the country forward on gay rights?"

Edwards, in response, gave an answer that was both offensive and incoherent.

"Because there are a whole group of issues, Tom, on which we can move the country forward, the president can move the country forward. For example, the recognition of partnership benefits, changing our immigration and adoption laws, so that they provide equality to gay and lesbian couples..."

He was asked about gay marriage, and he responded with talk about immigration laws.  He talked about adoption laws.

A)  What does immigration have to do with gay marriage?; B) If he is saying gay people should be able to adopt babies together, why can't they call themselves officially a family - even if they hold a marriage license issued by another state or country?  That was the question, and Edwards completely avoided it, choosing to ramble about entirely irrelevant and unrelated things.

Anyone who was considering Edwards really has to have serious pause at this point.

General Wesley Clark, on the other hand, had his best performance to date.  He started out the first round by using his first answer to state his case that he is the outsider who can fix Washington.  He absolutely dominated the next two rounds which related to foreign policy.  And when asked a difficult question about the judge who had been forced to remove the Ten Commandments from his court house, Clark gave an answer that sealed the deal for himself as the clear winner of this debate.

His answer finally made clear that no, Senator John Edwards is not the only southerner in this race.  Even more, it gave Clark a chance to open the door to his southern roots without being a pandering braggart, as Edwards has been at times.

And best of all, his answer was bold and direct.

"Tom, I grew up in the South and I went to church every Sunday and I did all that and I can quote Scriptures and so forth.

"But, you know, I think that we need to preserve the separation of church and state."

He didn't beat around the bush.  He didn't take minutes going on and on about his humble southern roots.  He simply laid it out in the typical understated nature of a truly confident man, and then directly answered the question.  Two sentences, and he had accomplished so much.

More importantly, he didn't pander - didn't even lean toward doing so for a second.  He could have spent a minute or so trying to appease the group of people who stood behind the judge and who aren't so fond of separating church and state.  But he didn't, and his bold clarity made a strong case for the General in an area far outside of the foreign policy realm.

And as he continued, he gave an answer that showed his views and values are inline with most Americans:

"I think that kids in school should have the opportunity to pray voluntarily. But when I was a kid in school in Little Rock, we read the Bible and we prayed in home room every morning. And it never occurred to me that I had Jewish friends sitting right there. Now I think, "What must they have thought?"

This is an answer that people of all faiths and varying strengths of religious belief can be happy with and which shows the General has respect both for religion and for people of varying faiths and beliefs.

On the other hand, John Kerry's performance tonight was sketchy and wandering.  Even more, Kerry had an outbreak of Dean syndrome, emphatically asserting that he had never said things that he actually had said.

Brokaw asked him, "How can you come South, given what you said about the Democrats making a mistake in spending too much time worry about the South..."

Kerry interrupted, claiming, "I never said Democrats made a mistake. I never said that all."

Sorry, John, but not only do we have this quote, as reported by ABC News:

"During a town hall meeting on the Dartmouth campus, Kerry noted that former Vice President Al Gore would be president if he'd won any number of other non-Southern states in 2000, including New Hampshire, West Virginia, and Ohio.

"Everybody always makes the mistake of looking South," Kerry said, in response to a question about winning the region. "Al Gore proved he could have been president of the United States without winning one Southern state, including his own."

...but there is also a video of you saying it right there on the ABC News page.


By "everybody" it is clear Kerry means every Democratic presidential candidate, which he even made clearer by then talking about the last one, Al Gore.

"I never said Democrats made a mistake. I never said that all."

"Everybody always makes the mistake..."

What is it with these New Englanders that they can't remember what it is they said - in this case, just a few days ago?  Nothing against New Englanders, because the ones we know don't have this problem.  Maybe it is just a problem with politicians who don't want to be held accountable for the BS they fling about.  They want to be able to say one thing to please one crowd and then have it as if they never said what they said when they are before another crowd.  That is why people are leery of career politicians.

And another reason why General Clark was the clear winner in this debate.  He made sure to make that case right up front:

"I want to make very clear that I'm not a career politician, I'm not a Washington insider. I am an outsider. And I'm running this race as someone who's spent his life in leadership and public service in this country. Not someone who's part of the problem, I'll be the solution to the problem."

As in a solution to the problem of people who don't say what they mean and don't want to be held accountable for what they really say, for one thing.

If in the past John Edwards had pulled himself from the fire in the September 5 debate, General Wesley Clark did that tonight.

He didn't put up with any nonsense from the moderator.  He made the case for himself early and clearly.  He got to show he is a cut above on foreign policy issues.  He got to show he has a delineated plan to deal with domestic issues.  And he got to make clear that there is more than one southerner in the race, as well as to show that he can be respectful of both religion and the separation of church and state without using some dishonest political trick.

And again, he showed himself to be the boldest and most plainspoken.

Only General Clark took President Bush to task for allowing 9/11 to happen on his watch.  Everyone else gives him a free ride.  And only General Clark clearly stated from direct knowledge that, "the (Bush) administration was determined to go into Iraq, whether or not there was any connection with 9/11; that they were going to use it as a pretext for invading Iraq."

Edwards said absurdly that there was no possibility anything had been exaggerated.  The others could only flail around about some meeting Vice President Cheney may or may not have interfered with things during.  But none could or did definitively say that the Iraq war was an unnecessary war - and any candidate who can not clearly make that case can not make the case against President Bush.

This is why the Bush administration is so afraid of General Clark - he has the goods on them.  No one else can even take a stand, while Clark can do it definitively.

Kerry once again showed himself unable to give answers that are direct and easy for an average person to follow.  Frequently he was off on rants and even seemed lost at times.  And he made, on top of his earlier dishonest denial, another bizarre statement.

Asked by Brokaw about previous comments he made with regard to affirmative action, Kerry said in his answer:

"Every statement I've ever made publicly supports it..."

Excuse me?  Well, John, tell us now what it is you say in private.

We must note here that this comment, somehow, was not included on some transcripts of the debate, such as the one they are running at the Washington Post.  We went back to the videotape just to make sure we had it right, and we do.

This is, again, the worst kind of politician-speak.  He is concerned with his record, has carefully chosen his words over the years and reviewed them to make sure he can assert that he has always said he supports affirmative action .

But in fact, as reported in a New York Times op-ed by David Brooks:

"Affirmative action, (Kerry) argued, "has kept America thinking in racial terms." It has helped foster a "culture of dependency." Further, he said, "there exists a reality of reverse discrimination that actually engenders racism."

The one thing Senator Kerry did not say last night is that he believes in affirmative action, that he agrees with it and thinks it is a good, important program.  All he said was that he, "always supported it," and that, "every statement I've ever made publicly supports it."

But there is something even worse in this if you look exactly at the exchange.  Brokaw said:

"Back in the 1990s, you expressed some reservations about affirmative action as it's currently constituted. You said that it represented a culture of dependency and that we have to reexamine that."

Back in 1992, Kerry said about affirmative action, as affirmed by multiple sources, such as the Boston Globe, that the cost of it was the creation of a:

"culture of dependency. . . . We must ask whether [social disintegration] is the result of a massive shift in the psychology of our nation that some argue grew out of the excesses of the 1960s, a shift from self-reliance to indulgence and dependence, from caring to self-indulgence, from public accountability to public abdication and chaos."

This is exactly what Tom Brokaw asserted he said.  Brokaw didn't say that Kerry was against affirmative action.  He simply say that, "back in the 1990's," Kerry had said that affirmative action, "represented a culture of dependency."  Kerry exactly had.  Brokaw said that Kerry argued back then that "we have to reexamine that."  Kerry exactly had, saying, "We must ask," whether there has been, "a shift from self-reliance to indulgence and dependence."

But when presented with exactly what he had said, Kerry, once again, emphatically denied he had ever said what he had exactly said:

"Actually, Tom, that's not what I said."

Actually, John, it is.  Brokaw said it fairly and accurately.  And for the second time in last night's debate you showed yourself to be suffering from Deanitis, the disease which causes a person to say empathically that they never said exactly what they said.

That is politics at its worst and something that calls into question the trustworthiness of what Senator Kerry tells us.  Don't give us dodges talking about what you have said publicly.  Give us straight talk, like the General did.

Last night, General Clark did what he needed to do in the debate, showing himself a cut above the rest.  He is leading in polls in Oklahoma, tied for the lead in Arizona, and in among the best financial shape of any candidate in the race.

Clearly, General Clark is among the frontrunners at the moment.  Now if he would just deal with the 900 pound elephant doing everything possible to ignore him and write him off, by next Wednesday he could be sitting in the driver's seat.

This morning would be the perfect opportunity - fresh off a great debate performance and with strong standing in the polls - for Clark to begin to comment about the non-M/I media's coverage of him, or lack thereof.  He has to be aware of it, and not to deal with it is dishonest.  And dealing with it under the current circumstances would absolutely have an immediate effect on the coverage he is receiving.

But we will have to see if the General is ready to take advantage of last night's victory or is willing to let it - and him - be tossed by the wayside.

In either case, last night the General showed us all why his is the best candidate for President of the United States.  For one thing, he is able to open his mouth without blathering nonsense flying out.  And at The Moderate Independent, we always consider that a big plus.  And in this Democratic field, it is a rare trait indeed.






"Gen. Tommy Franks Says That If The United States Is Hit With A Weapon Of Mass Destruction That Inflicts Large Casualties, The Constitution Will Likely Be Discarded In Favor Of A Military Form Of Government."

Economy - New Gallup Poll And Labor Number Challenge Bush's Assessment Of Economy

The Biggest Issue No One Is Talking About - President Bush's Naive Foreign Policy Allows Putin To Play Him And Set The Stage For The Second Coming Of The USSR

Why I Want To Be A Republican

Even The Turkey Was Fake! Bird In Widely Used AP Photo Was Just A Photo-Op Prop

President Bush Bans Press Coverage Of Wesley Clark's Testimony Against Milosevic

Iraq Was Planned In 1998 - Four Years Before 9/11

Petition already signed by 2,200 Americans demanding the expulsion of U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay presented to Congress ethics committee members - you can sign it on-line by Guest Writer Jackson Thoreau

Standing Up For True Conservatives - The Destruction By The Neo-Cons Of All That Was Held Dear By Conservatives Has A Growing Number Joining The Ranks Of Independents

Bush Successfully Shifts Media Attention With Bogus Story Yet Again

No Photo Opportunity Left Behind - President Bush brings a few hand-picked reporters with him to Baghdad and has them quote a soldier as saying, "He's got to win in '04

Media Under Assault - President Bush Issues 10 "Ground Rules" For Covering The President's Visit To FT

Rush Limbaugh Busted Red-Handed! - He Runs Numbers About Tax Cuts For The Rich, But Even The Numbers Show How Stupid His Argument Is

UPDATE! - We Now Have The Full Story About The Woman Who Filed A Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against President Bush Last Year And Was Just Found Dead Of Gunshot Wound To Head - by Guest Writer Jackson Thoreau

I Mean, Goddamn It! How Can We Satirize These People If They Keep Satirizing Themselves?

The Enron-One-Two Run By Schwarzenegger In Just His First Few Hours In Office

Al Gore: 9/11 Could Have - And Should Have - Been Prevented

The Moderate Independent Platform - What A Platform Should Be - Solutions, Not Argument Points And Money Talk

This Quarter's Economic Disaster Touted As "Record Growth"

Wesley Clark, Jr.: "President Bush Has The 'Anti-Midas' Touch"

Absolutely No Decency Or Sense Of Morals

The Bush Administration's Actions Directly Parallel A Hostile Corporate Takeover

Let's Talk About How Friggin Stupid The Democratic Candidates Are For Debating On Fox News

A New Era Of Never Taking Responsibility

What Rumsfeld Really Thinks: "The US Is Putting Relatively Little Effort Into A Long-range Plan"

President Bush "Groped Repeatedly" By Schwarzenegger At California Meeting

"Joe Millionaire" To Be Season Long Campaign Commercial For President Bush

Case Closed: The Curse Is Not The Cause - Boston Exactly Follows The Cubs Lead And Lets Loser Thinking Send Them Home

Cubs Need A Ball Check

Absurdity Taken So Far It Has Become Assininity

Five Lies That Were Definitively Debunked By The California Recall Election

The Inside Scoop On The Most Powerful Man In Cyberspace

Bush Shows Himself To Be A Wimp After All

"Thank God Bush Was President on 9/11, Not Al Gore"

Getting The Left And Middle Right

Eight Things Democrats and Republicans Need To Change

British press reports Schwarzenegger’s groping and affair with former Little House on the Prairie actress; When will U.S. media do so? A column by guest writer Jackson Thoreau

Right-Wing Installs Another Puppet

The Moderate Independent To Sue President Bush

President Bush Takes Cowardice To A New Level

"Let Me Try To Confuse You Into Thinking This Has Anything To Do With The War On Terror." - A Simple Transcript Of The President's Recent Speech On Iraq

The Republicans' Choice For California's Next Governor

"President Eisenhower Must Be Speaking Out In His Grave About The Military Industrial Complex That He Warned About"

Gray Davis Changes Strategy

If Texas Wasn't A State, Would We Be Better Off?

Gray Davis Uses UCLA Speech To Give The Moderate Independent Free Advertising

California Recall Update: Strategies Of The Republicans And Democrats Go Into Action

Schwarzenegger To Be Replaced On Ballot By Howdy Doody

Yes, Arnold Is An N-Word-Using Racist, But Did He Also Harass Ronald Reagan's Daughter Patti?

David Kelly Had Said On Feb. 27 To Un Employee That If Iraq Was Invaded He Would, "Be Found Dead In The Woods."

Osama, Saddam Release Tape Of Britney Spears

Crisis Alert: Americans Accidentally Start Hating Americans

ENRON: Politics, Criminals, And Blame

Alpha Males Or Unintelligent, Big-Mouthed Morons?

Yes, Arnold Is An N-Word-Using Racist, But Did He Also Harrass Ronald Reagan's Daughter Patti?

Embattled California Governor Gray Davis Launches "Pre-Emptive" Strike On Cancun

At Last, Corporate Media Starts To Cover Schwarzenegger Story We Broke Months Ago

Davis Votes To Recall Himself

Schwarzenegger trails in latest poll - media that kissed his ass for weeks pretends poll doesn't exist

Blair And Friends Kick The Corpse Of Man Who Told BBC Lied About WMD's - Press, Of Course, Forgets About Story Within A Day

The Mission Of The Moderate Independent: Changing The, "They Both Suck, So I Don't Vote' Equation

John S. Ashton Is Back! Rewriting The Rewriting Of History - Mud To Throw Back In The Eyes Of Bush/Limbaughian Idiots

Counterpoint: Murder Or War Success?

Nation After Nation After Nation Is Joining Our "Coalition Of The Willing"

M/I Undercover:  Racism And Politics?  We Went Undercover To Find Out The Reality

Blair's Man Spits On The Corpse Of Man Who Told BBC Blair Lied

Dick Cheney Launches Attack On Peru

One policy that would improve all of our working conditions, and the cost to implement it is negligible

President Bush and Vice President Cheney Celebrate the 200th U.S. Death in Iraq With a Whirl-Wind of Fundraisers, Boasts of "Mission Accomplished"

Unraveling the fat trap: pt. 1 in a series two things you can do to lose weight - that will save you money as well

FBI Called In To Look For Missing Tax Cut Windfall

Battling Back: The Texas Three-Step

Governor Davis Launches Pre-Emptive Strike On Cancun

From The Mouths of Republicans:  The Truth Behind The California Recall

Notes From The California Recall - Democrats Begin to Fight Back

President Lands On Aircraft Carrier To Celebrate End Of Palestinian/Israeli Conflict

Man Who Told Parliament Blair Lied About WMD's Believed To Be Dead

Battling Back: The Texas Three-step

Republicans Decide To Do Away With Elections

Umm, It's Another One Of Yours, George

FBI Called In To Look For Missing Tax Cut Windfall

Let's Get Something Straight: This New Breed Of Republican Is Pathetic

Republicans Begin To Cry Like Babies, Swear Like Bullies

"Pyrrhic Victory" Officially Renamed "Bush Victory"

Democrats Court The "Asshole Vote"

Democrats, Shocked And Awed As Gingrich Calls Bush's Role In War An "Unrelenting Defeat", Hire Him As New Spokesman

Like Father, Like Son: Bush To "Destabilize" Iran, Thinking It Will Somehow Stabilize Region

Why People Don't Belong To Either Party

On The Serious Side: President Bush's Great Diplomatic Success

Bush, Rove Start Planning Who to Blame, Bomb When 9/11 of Global Warming Arrives

Bush Admits He's Been Asking "Wrong Jesus" What He Would Do

Bush Hires Saddam's Information Minister

Could Bush Really Be To Blame For Ruining The Economy?

Democrats Suffering From 'SARS'

Is President Bush Being Exploitive, Landing "Top Gun" Style?

Santorum, Lott Sent Back To "Two-Shouldered" School

Tax Rate That Existed Throughout Booming Nineties Somehow Blamed For Current Downturn

Bush Thanks Osama, Saddam for Salvaging Republican Party

Schwarzenegger: "I'll make Bush Seem Like Mother Teresa"

Carter Ecstatic, Finally Freed Of "Worst President Ever" Label

Dick, Bush, And Colin: Fifth Graders, World-Leaders Laugh Hysterically At leaders' Combined Name Humor

Back to Top


Asia Hands Bush's Brother $2 Million And Lots Of Bush For Nothing But Being Bush, And More...

The Future Of The Moderate Independent - Can Anyone Say M/I TV?

A Labor Day Message

What Exactly Are You Complaining About?

Ooo, He Really Makes You Mad, Doesn't He?

Does Frequently Attacking Bush/Limbaugh Republicans Make M/I Biased?

Without That Tax Cut Money, They Couldn't Get Laid - The Differences Between Bushies And The Rest Of Us

Point: Is There Anything We Weren't Right About?

Feedback - Have Republicans found any fault with Bush's Iraq policy yet?

Did The President Lie About WMD's?


The Idea of a “Moderate Independent” News Source

Bush's Greatest Success To Date:  Not Getting UN Support for the Iraq War

Back to Top

Media Watch

Soros Donates A Lot Of Money? How About Murdoch Donating An Entire Network To The Bushies?

Tale Of Two Memos - The Story Of Two Leaked Memos, One From The Dems One From The GOP, Settle Once And For All Any Doubts That FOX News Is Anything Other Than Republican Puppet Station

CNN’S Christiane Amanpour Joins The Chorus Of Top 'Mainstream' Media People Saying They've Been Bullied To The Right By The Bushies

Talk Radio Host Rush Limbaugh Joins His Buddy Michael Savage Weiner In Getting Canned For Being Unacceptable Outside Of His Usual AM Radio Cave

The California Recall Debate

Larry Elder Proves Again To Be The Biggest Pussy On AM Talk Radio

ABC's Peter Jennings Admits ABC Has Been Bullied To The Right By The Bushies

Latest Press Report Ignores Poll, Pretends Arnold Is Still Frontrunner

Press-Trumpeted Lies About The 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals, And The Republican Plan To Take Redistricting To The Courts As Well

Savage Weiner Roasted Due To Anti-gay Rant

Rupert Mudoch On An Anti-American Rampage

Russian News Source 'Pravda' Sues Fox News For Stealing Its Format

AM Talk Host Savage Weiner Comes Out Of The Closet

CNBC'S Licklow And Kissass Invent 'Miscussion'

How To Still Sound Righteous When Caught Lying And Your Policies Are Found To Be Disastrous

Debunking The Media: ABC News' George Will Calls Vermont Communist

Debunking The Media: Man Kills 2 With Samurai Sword, Right Wing Rushes to Profit Off Of Corpses

Debunking The Media: The Confused, Psychotic Defining of "Conservative"

Debunking The Media: Texas Republicans Use Homeland Security Dept. To Try And Locate President Bush's Morals

Did Someone Actually Say "Liar"?

Right-Wing Commentators Distraught Murdoch Can't Buy Whole Internet

AM Radio Host Debate a Disaster

Australian-Owned Fox News, USA Today, NY Post Push "True American Agenda"

Axis of Murdoch Decides Who To Occupy Next

Back to Top


Ben Affleck Overheard Begging Matt Damon To Pinch His Ass In Public

Kelly Clarkson Ordered To Undergo Mental Evaluation

American Artists Vow To Continue Expressing Nothing Through Their Work

Dixie Chicks Treated With Southern Courtesy and Respect

Back to Top

Elections 2004

Rounding Up The Reactions - What Do The Democrats Have To Say About The Capture Of Saddam

Democrats Start To Get The Feel For Standing Up To The Media In Horribly Moderated Debate

Confirmation Of Clark's Rise Toward Front-Runner Status Comes Quickly

Inside The Campaigns - One Campaign Rising, One Holding Strong, One On The Way Out

Why People Love Howard Dean

Analysis: "How Dare They Be Angry That I Am A Liar Who Is Destroying The Nation!"

Democratic Presidential Hopefuls Disgrace Themselves, Hurt Their Election Changes By Bashing Clark For Being An Independent

Why Clark's Entry Into The Race Hurts Dean And Helps Kerry

Reassessing The Candidates

Cal Recall Update:  9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Recalls The Recall

Who Won Sept. 5 Dem. Debate?

Democrats Debate:  In Their Own Words, The Sept. 5 Debate

Reassessing The Candidates

A Presidential Study In Ignorance And A Warning For Those Who Would Vote For Arnold

Dean Vs. Bush, According To The Corporate-Owned-And-Operated Media

Make No Mistake, For One Party The 2004 Presidential Election Has Already Begun

Dean In Charge

Rating The Dems On The Issues

The Moderate Independent Rates The Democratic Hopefuls Based On How Moderate And Independent They Are

Back to Top


"A Great Nation Like Ours Will Never Fall!" A Collection Of Quotes From Pericles, Constantine, Napoleon, and Gorbachev

George Pissed About French Interference With War

The History Of The 1st Amendment

Back to Top


Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao Confused By Total Lack Of Enemies

Fashion Critics Doubt Lula's New Look For Real

Northrop, Occidental To Sponsor Shakira's Columbian Tour

Powerful French, German, Russian Alliance Shows Strength By Letting US Occupy Iraq, Take Its Oil

Back to Top


Coming Out Of The Closet Award: Country Music's Integrity On Display

Back to Top


See Who MI Readers Picked For First Choice For President in 2004

See what your fellow M/I readers had to say about their loyalty or lack of it to the current face of the Republican Party

Rating the War on Terror

Thoughts On Speaking Out During a War

Has President Bush Kept His Promise To Be A Uniter, Not A Divider

Back to Top